<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>The First Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefirstscience.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefirstscience.org</link>
	<description>and the Generic Code</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:11:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What is Gender?</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/11/05/what-is-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/11/05/what-is-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative to Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are some work notes for a paper I am writing on gender. I cannot publish the guts of the paper here, at least not yet. But be prepared. There is no construct in science more fundamental than gender. The ancients knew this but the moderns have long since forgotten it. This post will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/11/05/what-is-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Bang versus the Big Birth</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/07/02/the-big-bang-versus-the-big-birth/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/07/02/the-big-bang-versus-the-big-birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 06:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stoicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are  two different takes on explaining the origins of the universe., one modern and the other very ancient. The two explanations can be summed up as the Big Bang and the Big Birth theories. Everyone has heard of the Big Bang theory where an unexplained event is initiated resulting in an incredibly huge amount [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/07/02/the-big-bang-versus-the-big-birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where is the centre of the universe?</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/05/06/where-is-the-centre-of-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/05/06/where-is-the-centre-of-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 23:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a post from the Stoic mailing list at Yahoo Groups. It touches on a central tenet of Stoicism. Jan wrote: It&#8217;s certainly traditional Stoic doctrine that somehow connected with the all-pervading Logos (=Zeus=Nature=Providence=designing fire) is the obligatory law of nature, aka jus nature; the mind of the (human) sage is, according to classical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/05/06/where-is-the-centre-of-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shape of Mind</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/04/11/the-epistemological-brain-the-shape-of-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/04/11/the-epistemological-brain-the-shape-of-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This section is about multiplication. In the large sense, multiplication brings two things together to make a third. In the case of numbers, this leads to simple arithmetic. In the case of two inebriated men at a bar, it can lead to a bar room brawl. The ancients, both in the West and the East, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/04/11/the-epistemological-brain-the-shape-of-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shape of Space</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/03/21/sparseness-and-shape/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/03/21/sparseness-and-shape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In  soon to appear book and its appendixes, we have mapped out the foundations of a new kind of geometry based on the right side scientific paradigm. When talking about the shape of knowledge, we must also talk about the shape of geometry. Traditional left side spatiality, like Hilbert space for example, is notable for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/03/21/sparseness-and-shape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dawkins Ignorance Hypothesis</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/13/the-dawkins-ignorance-hypothesis/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/13/the-dawkins-ignorance-hypothesis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins’ polemic, The God Delusion, is an excellent example of left side reasoning and so it is not surprising that he presents a worldview that is totally at odds with the main thrust of our project. His polemic has been widely contested on many fronts but one of his core assumptions seems to have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/13/the-dawkins-ignorance-hypothesis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shape of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/12/the-shape-of-knowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/12/the-shape-of-knowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative to Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In any ground breaking project there is a polemical streak and this work is no exception. Topics covered in this blog have raged across the axis of traditional left side science and our proposed right side science. The arena for this epic tussle has been the nature and structure of scientific knowledge. What we have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/12/the-shape-of-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strife</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/11/strife/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/11/strife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To Karl Marx, change presents as the history of class struggle. According to Empedocles, change was the outcome of the incessant struggle between the forces of Love and Strife. Love unites the elements together to become all things. On the other hand, Strife brings about the dissolution of the one back into the many. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2012/02/11/strife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are there Two Hemispheres?</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/25/why-are-there-two-hemispheres/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/25/why-are-there-two-hemispheres/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/25/why-are-there-two-hemispheres/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here, we are talking about the two epistemological hemispheres of left side and right side science, left side knowledge and right side knowledge  There are two kinds of take on reality. There are two kinds of knowledge. We leave implicit that this may also shed a lot of light into the biological arena concerning the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/25/why-are-there-two-hemispheres/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there an alternative to Abstraction?</title>
		<link>http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/16/is-there-an-alternative-to-abstraction/</link>
		<comments>http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/16/is-there-an-alternative-to-abstraction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas J H Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative to Abstraction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/16/is-there-an-alternative-to-abstraction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years back I was listening to an interview on the radio with a female intellectual from the Middle East. She was asked the question &#8220;What do you find is the most seductive thing about Western culture?&#8221; Her response was direct and succinct. &#8220;Abstraction,&#8221; she replied, without any hesitation. Her reply stuck with me [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thefirstscience.org/2011/12/16/is-there-an-alternative-to-abstraction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.948 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-20 04:50:09 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->